Listeners:
Top listeners:
play_arrow
Paul Verschure on consciousness and distributed adaptive control CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Edvard Moser on grid cells and entorhinal cortex CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Giacomo Rizzolatti on mirror neurons and action understanding CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Robert Axelrod on game theory and prisoner's dilemma CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Adrian Owen on disorders of consciousness and vegetative state CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Jonathan Whitlock on markerless motion capture and posterior parietal cortex CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Luis Puelles on neuroanatomy and prosomeric model CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Zoltan Molnar on subplate neurons and cortical development CSN Podcasts
Episode 10 14.03.2012
play_arrow
PLAY EPISODE
How does an ant with a brain smaller than a pinhead navigate miles of desert using visual memories that would be unrecognizable to a human eye? Andy Philippides reveals the elegant simplicity of insect navigation and why it could outperform GPS-dependent robots in denied environments.
Subscribe for more from the Convergent Science Network podcast series.
Philippides explains why studying ants in their natural environment is essential: laboratory stimuli produce fundamentally different neural responses than the real world. Desert ants like Melophorus bagoti are ideal subjects because they are social foragers that learn routes in a single trial, their behavior gives a direct readout of their nervous system, and researchers can track their entire foraging range. Crucially, ants do not use cognitive maps. Their route memories are insulated by context, so an ant placed mid-path while fed will head home, while an empty ant placed at the same spot will head outward.
The interview dissects the complementary navigation strategies ants employ. Path integration, combining step counting with a polarized-light compass, provides a baseline homing vector but accumulates errors over distance. Ants compensate by deliberately aiming to one side of the nest, much like sailors using dead reckoning would aim to one side of a port. From the very first trip, ants layer visual memories on top of path integration, using the skyline silhouette of trees against the sky as a robust, stable landmark. Philippides describes his group’s visual compass model, where ants store panoramic snapshots oriented toward their goal and recover heading by rotating on the spot to minimize image difference, a strategy supported by observed saccadic scanning behavior in unfamiliar environments.
The computational implications are striking. With poor-resolution compound eyes, minimal memory, and limited processing power, ants achieve remarkably robust navigation. Philippides argues these bioinspired algorithms could serve UAVs, space exploration, and any platform where GPS is unavailable and computational resources are constrained. Taking panoramic images from ant-level positions has already revealed how radically different the visual world appears at ground level, where most of the visual field is sky and ground, and prominent landmarks simply disappear into the background.
Tagged as:
ant vision Ants insect navigation Navigation Path Integration Visual Memories
About the author call_made
Both the triumphs of humanity and its most evil deeds have resulted from collaboration. In a time where humanity is required to aspire to the former and minimize the latter, the question arises of how collaboration arises and why it fails. Surprisingly, this phenomenon, so central to who we are, is not well understood. Hence, a collaborative effort is required to understand collaboration in its full biological, psychological, sociological, cultural, and economic complexity and to translate this understanding into operational impact. This series of podcasts is one step toward achieving these complementary goals. The Collaboration Podcast presents interviews with people who are central orchestrators of collaboration in various domains including business, government, science, art, health, sustainability, and the military. The discussions were conducted by Prof. Dr. Paul F.M.J. Verschure and members of the Program Advisory Committee of the Ernst Strungmann Forum on Collaboration (https://www.esforum.de/forums/ESF32_Collaboration.html) during 2021 and had the goal to sketch a map of opportunities, challenges, and obstacles in human collaboration. The forum took place in May 2022, and now we would like to share this series of interviews with a broader audience. The full report of the Forum will be published in 2023 by MIT Press. The podcast was produced by the Convergent Science Network (https://www.convergentsciencenetwork.org/). Context: The stability of social systems depends critically on realizing sustainable methods of “collaboration,” yet how and by which means collaboration is achieved is not clearly understood; neither are the conditions or processes that lead to its breakdown or failure. Collaboration can be understood as cooperation between agents toward mutually constructed goals. Part of the reason for our lack of understanding is that the phenomenon of collaboration is, by nature, a highly multidisciplinary problem, and effective research into its complexities has been difficult to achieve across the broad range of scientific and technical disciplines involved. The need for a fundamental understanding of collaboration, however, has become increasingly important. Not only does humankind demand answers as it attempts to address critical challenges at multiple scales (e.g., climate change, migration, enhanced automation, social and economic inequality), but ever-increasing technological and economic means of interconnecting people and societies are disrupting long-established, familiar patterns of how we interact. Radical technological changes that are ongoing have the potential to reshape collaboration in ways that are currently hard to predict or influence (e.g., by altering configurations in interaction, information creation, and modes of communication). On one hand, such changes could disrupt hitherto stable forms of collaboration by affecting critical communication channels and traditional roles, as can be observed in the rapidly changing patterns in governance, commerce, and social interaction. Conversely, technology could lead to the emergence of novel, successful forms of collaboration that deviate from traditional “hierarchical” architectures. Evidence of this can be seen in areas as diverse as highly automated manufacturing plants, the open science movement, collaborative software repositories, user-centered services, and the sharing of economy-based modes of organization. Without a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms, processes, and boundary conditions of collaboration, it is not possible to evaluate or predict which of these possible scenarios are sustainable or even plausible. The Forum “How Collaboration Arises and Why it Fails” (May 8–13, 2022, Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany) Chairs: Andreas Roepstorff and Paul Verschure Program Advisory Committee: Jenna Bednar, Julia R. Lupp, Bhavani R. Rao , Andreas Roepstorff, Ferdinand von Siemens, and Paul Verschure
14.03.2012
Exploring the convergence of neuroscience, robotics, and AI through conversations with leading researchers since 2010.
A project of the Convergent Science Network Foundation.
© CSN Podcasts. Developed by IMCreative & WEBC
✖
✖
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.
✖
Be the first to leave a comment