Listeners:
Top listeners:
play_arrow
Paul Verschure on consciousness and distributed adaptive control CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Edvard Moser on grid cells and entorhinal cortex CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Giacomo Rizzolatti on mirror neurons and action understanding CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Robert Axelrod on game theory and prisoner's dilemma CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Adrian Owen on disorders of consciousness and vegetative state CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Jonathan Whitlock on markerless motion capture and posterior parietal cortex CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Luis Puelles on neuroanatomy and prosomeric model CSN Podcasts
play_arrow
Zoltan Molnar on subplate neurons and cortical development CSN Podcasts
Episode 2 14.03.2011
play_arrow
PLAY EPISODE
Why do bacteria have more elegant network architecture than the internet , and what can both teach us about building robust, evolvable systems? John Doyle unpacks the universal design principle of layered constraints that biology and technology share. Subscribe for more from the Convergent Science Network podcast series. John Doyle is a control theorist and mathematician who found himself drawn to biology by a simple observation: the bacterial biosphere has one of the most robust and evolvable architectures on Earth. It evolved into us, yet continues to adapt with remarkable speed on every timescale , rearranging protein networks in seconds, swapping genes across species over generations. Doyle argues that this dual capacity for rapid robustness and rapid evolvability stems from a shared architectural principle: layered constraints that deconstrain. The concept, borrowed from biologists Gerhardt and Kirschner, holds that a few wisely chosen constraints , like ATP as a universal energy carrier or TCP/IP as a packet protocol , create platforms that enable enormous flexibility above them. In bacteria, core metabolic protocols have persisted for billions of years, yet they enable wildly dynamic responses to environmental challenges. In technology, operating systems sit between hardware and applications, enabling the plug-and-play modularity we take for granted. Doyle argues that layering is the highest-level expression of modularity, and that much of the scientific literature on modularity misses this point by focusing on component-level decomposition rather than the architectural constraints that make modularity possible. The interview draws a sobering contrast between biological and engineered systems. While bacterial biochemistry appears spectacularly well-designed from an engineering perspective, refined over billions of years of selection, human-built large-scale systems are profoundly unsustainable. Doyle is blunt: our energy, transportation, water, and food networks have recognizable design flaws, and the interplay between technology, markets, and policy is the least understood system of all. He uses a clothing metaphor to make architecture accessible: garments have both an inner-to-outer layering (skin layer, insulation, weather protection) and a compositional layering (fiber to yarn to cloth to garment), illustrating how different dimensions of constraint combine synergistically. Doyle also highlights a critical lesson from both biology and the internet: if you make a mistake in a core protocol and build extensively on top of it, correction becomes nearly impossible. The internet’s early design choices, made by operating systems engineers who won a historical battle against information theorists, are now deeply embedded , brilliant in some respects, flawed in others, and extraordinarily difficult to change.
Tagged as:
control theory Layered Constraints network architecture Principle Layered Robust Evolvable
About the author call_made
Both the triumphs of humanity and its most evil deeds have resulted from collaboration. In a time where humanity is required to aspire to the former and minimize the latter, the question arises of how collaboration arises and why it fails. Surprisingly, this phenomenon, so central to who we are, is not well understood. Hence, a collaborative effort is required to understand collaboration in its full biological, psychological, sociological, cultural, and economic complexity and to translate this understanding into operational impact. This series of podcasts is one step toward achieving these complementary goals. The Collaboration Podcast presents interviews with people who are central orchestrators of collaboration in various domains including business, government, science, art, health, sustainability, and the military. The discussions were conducted by Prof. Dr. Paul F.M.J. Verschure and members of the Program Advisory Committee of the Ernst Strungmann Forum on Collaboration (https://www.esforum.de/forums/ESF32_Collaboration.html) during 2021 and had the goal to sketch a map of opportunities, challenges, and obstacles in human collaboration. The forum took place in May 2022, and now we would like to share this series of interviews with a broader audience. The full report of the Forum will be published in 2023 by MIT Press. The podcast was produced by the Convergent Science Network (https://www.convergentsciencenetwork.org/). Context: The stability of social systems depends critically on realizing sustainable methods of “collaboration,” yet how and by which means collaboration is achieved is not clearly understood; neither are the conditions or processes that lead to its breakdown or failure. Collaboration can be understood as cooperation between agents toward mutually constructed goals. Part of the reason for our lack of understanding is that the phenomenon of collaboration is, by nature, a highly multidisciplinary problem, and effective research into its complexities has been difficult to achieve across the broad range of scientific and technical disciplines involved. The need for a fundamental understanding of collaboration, however, has become increasingly important. Not only does humankind demand answers as it attempts to address critical challenges at multiple scales (e.g., climate change, migration, enhanced automation, social and economic inequality), but ever-increasing technological and economic means of interconnecting people and societies are disrupting long-established, familiar patterns of how we interact. Radical technological changes that are ongoing have the potential to reshape collaboration in ways that are currently hard to predict or influence (e.g., by altering configurations in interaction, information creation, and modes of communication). On one hand, such changes could disrupt hitherto stable forms of collaboration by affecting critical communication channels and traditional roles, as can be observed in the rapidly changing patterns in governance, commerce, and social interaction. Conversely, technology could lead to the emergence of novel, successful forms of collaboration that deviate from traditional “hierarchical” architectures. Evidence of this can be seen in areas as diverse as highly automated manufacturing plants, the open science movement, collaborative software repositories, user-centered services, and the sharing of economy-based modes of organization. Without a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms, processes, and boundary conditions of collaboration, it is not possible to evaluate or predict which of these possible scenarios are sustainable or even plausible. The Forum “How Collaboration Arises and Why it Fails” (May 8–13, 2022, Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany) Chairs: Andreas Roepstorff and Paul Verschure Program Advisory Committee: Jenna Bednar, Julia R. Lupp, Bhavani R. Rao , Andreas Roepstorff, Ferdinand von Siemens, and Paul Verschure
Exploring the convergence of neuroscience, robotics, and AI through conversations with leading researchers since 2010.
A project of the Convergent Science Network Foundation.
© CSN Podcasts. Developed by IMCreative & WEBC
✖
✖
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.
✖
Be the first to leave a comment